I love good conversation especially when it is built around good writing. I felt like a fly on the wall reading this post. I would like to focus my attention on one line out of Bill Kerr’s post; “I (Bill) have always depicted cognitivism as a response to behaviorism” (Kerr, 2007). I believe this statement put the two theories in perspective. If there is no reason to learn what we want to learn and also what we are required to learn, then would we utilize our cognitive skills. For many of us who find learning exciting, and with few road blocks, the answer would seem like a resounding “yes”.
I would venture to say that we are somehow rewarded by our learning. I first started to put all my energy into learning after my mom died (15 years ago). It kept my mind busy and my focus off of the pain. That was reward in itself. Over time however, I needed learning less to hide my emotions and found satisfaction in research and learning. It was like a puzzle and I like to see children grow and break down cultural barriers due to their learning. All of this unwritten rewards for my work; Do I think about this when I am enjoying learning? No, it is now intrinsic and I learn for the love of learning. However, the learning was a response to behaviorism.
Not everyone finds joy in the path of learning. It is the grade, or getting a diploma so they can make more money at their job that motivates them to put their cognitive skills to work; again, a response to behaviorism. Cognitive skills do not come easy to everyone. It takes practice and consistent use of skills to grow and maintain strategies for learning. I think as teachers we sometimes expect children to possess skills for learning, but fail to teach them strategies to use and grow their cognitive skills. The same rings true for learning good behavior. As Piaget and other theorist point out, learning takes place in stages, we are always evolving and moving toward a more fluent use of knowledge. I also like how Kapp pointed out that “learning is not one thing…it is a multilayered word that tends to get treated as if it were just one thing… and it’s not” (Kapp, 2007).
I believe the _isms are as important as the theories. A community needs a common thread that ties knowledge together. Agree, disagree, or indignant, the _isms create a common ground to build off of as new information is integrated into old thoughts that resonate the same issues of today.
Kapp, K. (2007, January 2). Out and About: Discussion on Educational Schools of Thought.
Message posted to
http://karlkapp.blogspot.com/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on- educational.html
Kerr, B. (2007, January 1). _isms as filters, not blinkers. Message posted to
http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html